JudgeGPT represents a technological intervention in an already imperfect legal framework. While AI-assisted judicial tools could potentially reduce inconsistencies and processing delays, introducing them into a flawed system raises critical questions. The effectiveness of JudgeGPT depends on addressing existing structural problems first—including bias, resource disparities, and procedural inequities. Rather than automatically improving outcomes, deploying such technology without comprehensive legal reform might perpetuate or amplify current systemic issues. Experts suggest that JudgeGPT functions best as a supplementary tool within reformed institutions, not as a standalone solution to fundamental legal system deficiencies.
